indirect discrimination
-
Home Office (UK Border Agency) v Essop & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 609
Appeal against an EAT judgment, which had overturned an ET ruling that the claimants had not suffered indirect race and/or age discrimination.
- cases
22/06/2015 18:50
-
Greenland v Secretary of State for Justice UKEAT/0323/14/DA
Appeal against a decision of the employment tribunal dismissing a claim for indirect discrimination. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
29/01/2015 10:42
-
Unison (No 2), R (on the application of) v The Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 4198 (Admin)
Judgment in judicial review application concerning the legitimacy of the employment tribunal fees regime. Unsion were challenging the scheme on the gounds that it infringed the EU principle of effectiveness and that it discriminated indirectly against women. Both grounds were rejected and the application dismissed, largely because the applicant had not offered any evidence that individual claimants had been affected.
- cases
18/12/2014 08:29
-
Essop & Others v Home Office (UK Border Agency UKEAT/0480/13/SM
Appeal against decision that, in test cases concerning race and age discrimination, the claimants had to show not only that there was systemic disadvantage of their group, which was assumed, but why they had each failed the tests that were required for promotion and were the subject of these proceedings. Appeal allowed and remitted to the ET.
- cases
17/05/2014 21:22
-
Kapenova v Department of Health UKEAT/0142/13/SM
Appeal against a ruling which held that even though a PCP was indirectly discriminatory, it was justified and therefore not lawful. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
22/04/2014 10:38
-
Discrimination digest - Case Round-Up: April 2014
In this month’s round-up, Mark Shulman consultant solicitor with Keystone Law looks at recent cases covering discrimination against former employees, whether direct and indirect discrimination can arise from the same circumstances and continuing acts and time limits.
- resources
14/04/2014 08:22
-
Little v Richmond Pharmacology Ltd UKEAT/0490/12/LA
Appeal against a finding that the claimant had not suffered indirect sex discrimination after she was refused part time working after her maternity leave, a decision that was then reversed on appeal.
- cases
23/09/2013 09:56
-
Haq & Ors v The Audit Commission [2012] EWCA Civ 1621
Appeal against decision in the EAT that a restructuring exercise involving a department merger and pay protection of a senior grade had not resulted in indirect sex discrimination and was objectively justifiable. Appeal dismissed by a majority.
- cases
09/12/2012 10:02
-
Mather v Devine & Partners (Bramhall Park Medical Centre) UKEAT/0119/12/JOJ
Appeal against a majority finding that the claimant had not been subject to indirect sex discrimination. Appeal allowed and remitted to a fresh Tribunal.
- cases
04/11/2012 11:40
-
Copple v Littlewoods PLC & Ors 2011] EWCA Civ 1281
Appeal arising out of sex discrimination claims relating to pension provision for part-time workers where the claimants were seeking establish that an opt-out principle was a breach of equality for which a remedy must be provided. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
10/11/2011 15:07