cases
-
Mir v IQVIA Limited & Another [2024] EAT 50
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant was not disabled. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
07/05/2024 12:11
-
Bodis v Lindfield Christian Care Home Ltd [2024] EAT 65
Appeal against the dismissal of the complaints of s15 discrimination and unfair dismissal. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
07/05/2024 11:52
-
William v Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust [2024] EAT 58
Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claim of suffering detriments arising from her having made protected disclosures. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
30/04/2024 15:35
-
King v Thales DIS UK Ltd [2024] EAT 34
Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claims of sex and disability discrimination. Appeal allowed on one ground.
- cases
30/04/2024 13:37
-
Edwards v Ministry of Defence [2024] EAT 18
Appeal against a decision by the ET which said that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the Claimant's complaint because she had not made a service complaint as required by s121(1) of the Equality Act 2010. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
23/04/2024 09:12
-
Stena Drilling PTE Limited v Smith [2024] EAT 57
Appeal by respondents over jurisdiction where the claimant's contract stated Singapore as the choice of law after initially being employed by the Swedish business.
- cases
20/04/2024 11:05
-
Hilton Foods Solutions Ltd v Wright [2024] EAT 28
Appeal against a decision not to strike out the Claimant's claim that he was dismissed because he sought to take parental leave. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
17/04/2024 15:16
-
TwistDX Limited & Ors v Armes & Ors [2024] EAT 45
Appeal against refusal to strike out claims arising from protected disclosures and subsequent constructive dismissal of the claimants, who had concerns over the safety of the respondents' DNA amplification technology.
- cases
17/04/2024 10:44
-
Lewis v Dow Silicones UK Ltd: [2024] EAT 51
Second appeal arising from a TUPE claim where the claimant was saying he had been unfairly dismissed after a change of working conditions but the respondent said the change was necessary to effect wider business changes.
- cases
16/04/2024 10:35
-
Rajput & Anor v Sky Retail Stores Limited [2024] EAT 46
Appeal, in a claim concerning reorganisation of shop branches, running a new point where the respondent was entitled to a review of the rule 3(10) judge’s decision
- cases
13/04/2024 10:07