Items with the keyword striking_out
- Tough v Revenue and Customs UKEAT/0255/19/VPAppeal against the ET’s decision striking out the Claimant’s disability discrimination and harassment claims after concluding that he was not disabled. Appeal dismissed.(25/06/2020) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Dimitriu v Testerworld Ltd (t/a De Pharmaceutical) UKEAT/0088/19/OOAppeal against the ET’s dismissal of the Claimant’s claims for notice pay and sex and nationality discrimination, following her failure to attend a hearing. Appeal dismissed.(01/05/2020) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Itulu v London Fire Commissioner UKEAT/0298/18/BAAppeal against the ET’s order striking out the Claimant’s disability discrimination claims. Appeal dismissed.(23/03/2020) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Castano v London General Transport Services Ltd UKEAT/0150/19/DAAppeal against the ET’s judgment striking out the Claimant’s claims of detriment and automatic unfair dismissal on health and safety grounds. Appeal dismissed.(12/03/2020) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Duncan Lewis Solicitors Ltd v Puar UKEAT/0175/19/RNAppeal against the ET’s decision setting aside a previous order striking out the Claimant’s claim for failure to comply with an unless order. Appeal allowed.(15/01/2020) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Adams v Kingdom Services Group Ltd UKEAT/0235/18/LAAppeal against the ET’s decision making a deposit order in respect of the Claimant’s claim that he had been unfairly dismissed by the Respondent. Appeal dismissed.(18/12/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- MacLeod v The University Court of The University of Glasgow UKEATS/0022/19/ATAppeal against the ET’s decision striking out the Appellant’s case. Appeal dismissed.(10/12/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Parkin v Leeds City Council UKEAT/0178/19/RNAppeal against the ET’s decision striking out the Claimant’s claims for sex discrimination or harassment on the basis that they had no reasonable prospect of success. Appeal allowed.(02/12/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- E & O Laboratories v Miller UKEATS/0007/19/SSAppeal against the ET’s decision striking out the Appellants’ defence under rule 37(1)(b) and (e) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1. Appeal allowed.(24/10/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Arthur v Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust UKEAT/0121/19/LAAppeal against the ET’s judgment striking out the Claimant’s claims of public interest disclosure detriment and dismissal, and its decision that, in the alternative, it would have made deposit orders as a condition of such claims being pursued. Appeal allowed in part.(18/09/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
172 items • page 1/18 • next
