Employment Cases Update
home
cases
news
legislation
resources
CPD
jobs
services
keywords
email
password
log on
sign up
Items with the keyword
sexual_harassment
Commerzbank AG v Rajput UKEAT/0164/18/RN
Appeal against the ET’s decision regarding the Claimant’s complaints of sex discrimination, harassment and maternity discrimination. Appeal allowed in part.
(09/07/2019) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Vernon v Azure Support Services Ltd & Ors UKEAT/0192/13/SM
Appeal and cross appeal in case involving questions of vicarious liability for sexual harassment after a TUPE transfer and discrimination claims. Claimant's appeal on the liability allowed. Respondent’s appeal on the discrimination issue dismissed.
(09/11/2014) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Duffy v George [2013] EWCA Civ 908
Appeal against the EAT’s decision that an ET does not necessarily err in law if it proceeds with a hearing and makes findings adverse to a respondent where a claimant does not attend and so is unavailable for cross examination. Appeal allowed and remitted for a complete re-hearing before a different Tribunal.
(24/07/2013) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Hurst v Kelly UKEAT/0167/13/DM
Appeal against a decision by the ET that they did not have jurisdiction to hear a claim of victimisation which was directed only towards a fellow employee, a compromise agreements having been reached with the employer. Appeal allowed.
(11/07/2013) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Duffy v George UKEAT/0517/11/KN
Appeal against a finding by the ET, that the respondent had sexually harassed the claimant, which was made without the claimant attending the hearing. Appeal dismissed.
(19/10/2012) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Nazir & Anor v Asim & Anor UKEAT/0332/09/RN
Appeal against findings of sexual and racial harassment and discrimination. The claims were brought against 2 members of a board, which was an unincorporated organisation: the Tribunal ruled that it had jurisdiction to hear the claims against the 2 board members in their capacity as representatives of the UA and not as individual perpetrators. 4 of the claims succeeded. The jurisdiction appeal was dismissed. The EATconfirmed that the board members were liable as 'employer' and not through vicarious or secondary liability. Claims of racial and sexual harassment and discrimination were remitted to a fresh Tribunal.
(30/06/2010) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Munchkins Restaurant & Anor v Karmazyn & Ors UKEAT/0359/09/LA; UKEAT/0481/09/LA
Appeal against decision of the Tribunal who ruled that the respondent had sexually harassed the claimants, leading to their constructive unfaoir dismissals. Appeal on most grounds failed, although appeals in relation to compensation awarded for wages during the notice period and for aggravated damages succeeded.
(01/06/2010) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
7 items
Find out more
Who can use this site?
What we publish
Why use our online training?
Pricing
Using the site
Search
Keep up to date
Complete an online course
Subscribe
View your training record
Legal Notices
About us
Support
T&Cs
Privacy
Follow us
Email
RSS
Twitter
LinkedIn
powered by
Zehuti
sign up for the employment cases update free weekly email newsletter