Items with the keyword sex_discrimination
- The Commissioner of The City of London Police v Geldart UKEAT/0032/19/RNAppeal against the ET’s judgment upholding the Claimant’s direct sex discrimination claim for partial non-payment of the London Allowance while on maternity leave, and awarding her compensation for injury to feelings. Appeal dismissed.(04/12/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Co-Operative Group Ltd and another v Walker UKEAT/0087/19/RNAppeal against the ET’s decision relating to an equal pay dispute between the Respondent and the Appellants. Appeal allowed.(22/11/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Caterham School Ltd v Rose UKEAT/0149/19/RNAppeal against the ET’s judgment at a Preliminary Hearing allowing the Claimant’s direct discrimination claims to proceed, even though they were submitted out of time. Appeal, and Claimant’s cross-appeal, allowed.(14/11/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Tabidi v British Broadcasting Corporation UKEAT/0272/18/BAAppeal against the ET’s decision dismissing the Claimant’s complaint of sex discrimination and awarding costs against him. Appeal dismissed.(24/07/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Commerzbank AG v Rajput UKEAT/0164/18/RNAppeal against the ET’s decision regarding the Claimant’s complaints of sex discrimination, harassment and maternity discrimination. Appeal allowed in part.(09/07/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Ali v Capita Customer Management Ltd; Hextall v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police [2019] EWCA Civ 900Appeals against the EAT’s decisions that different rates of pay for new mothers and their partners did not constitute unlawful discrimination. Appeals dismissed and cross-appeal allowed.(05/06/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Prasad v Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust UKEAT/0111/18/RNAppeal against the ET’s decision to dismiss a particular complaint of harassment brought by the Claimant. Appeal and cross-appeal allowed.(05/04/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Asda Stores Ltd v Brierley and others [2019] EWCA Civ 44Appeal against the EAT’s finding that the Claimants, mostly women working in the Respondent’s supermarkets, were entitled to compare themselves, for equal pay purposes, with employees working in the Respondent’s distribution operation. Appeal dismissed.(19/02/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Gan Menachem Hendon Ltd v De Groen UKEAT/0059/18/OOAppeal against the ET’s findings of direct sex discrimination, direct and indirect discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief, and harassment. Appeal allowed in part.(12/02/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- The Lord Chancellor & Anor v McCloud & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 2844Appeals against an EAT decision that judges and firefighters had been treated less favourably in relation to their pension schemes. Appeals dismissed.(23/01/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
119 items • page 1/12 • next
