Employment Cases Update

Items with the keyword redundancy

X v Y Ltd UKEAT/0261/17/JOJAppeal against a decision that parts of the Claimant's ET1 should be struck out on the basis that they depended on information that was protected by legal advice privilege. Appeal allowed and the decision to strike out those paragraphs was set aside.(10/08/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
Nimalraj v NHS Thurrock Clinical Commissioning Group [2017] EWHC 1322 (QB)Hearing to decide if the Claimant was dismissed for redundancy or for some other reason, the latter meaning that he was ineligible to stand for election to the governing body of the CCG. The court concluded that he was dismissed for redundancy.(14/03/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
Mirab v Mentor Graphics (UK) Ltd UKEAT/0172/17/DAAppeal against a finding that the Claimant had been fairly dismissed by reason of redundancy. Appeal allowed in part.(13/03/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
Keeping Kids Company (In compulsory liquidation) v Smith & Ors UKEAT/0057/17/BAAppeal against a finding that the employer had failed to comply with its obligations under section 188 TULRCA after it was placed in compulsory liquidation, and that the employees were therefore entitled to a 90-day protective award. Appeal allowed in part.(23/02/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
John Bourne & Co v Weedon UKEAT/0150/17/JOJAppeal against a finding that the Claimant was constructively dismissed by reason of redundancy and that he was entitled to a redundancy payment accordingly. Appeal allowed and remitted to fresh Tribunal.(04/01/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
The Employment Rights Act 1996 and Pension Schemes Act 1993 (Amendment) Regulations 2017Definition of employer expanded for the purposes of payments by the National Insurance Fund(14/12/2017) • legislation • CPD: 0/0 mins
Lynam & Anor v Birmingham City Council UKEAT/0072/17/JOJAppeal against the dismissal of the Claimants' claims that the Respondent had breached their contracts of employment by failing to offer them the opportunity to apply for a voluntary redundancy package before dismissing them. Appeal allowed.(07/09/2017) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
Xerox Business Services Philippines Inc Ltd v Zeb UKEAT/0121/16/DMAppeal against findings that there had been a variation in the Claimant's contract of employment, that he was not redundant and that he had been unfairly dismissed. Appeal allowed and remitted to a fresh Tribunal.(05/09/2017) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
Seahorse Maritime Ltd v Nautilus International (A Trade Union) UKEAT/0281/16/LAAppeal against a ruling that the separate ships on which the employees worked were not separate establishments for the purposes of TULR(C)A and against a ruling that the ET had jurisdiction to consider a claim that there had been a failure to consult about redundancies pursuant to section 188 of TULR(C)A. Appeal dismissed.(13/07/2017) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd v McDowell UKEAT/0318/16/RNAppeal against a ruling that the Respondent had discriminated against employees on the grounds of age by capping redundancy payments for those aged 65 and over because they would be entitled to access occupational pension benefits. Appeal allowed in part.(13/07/2017) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins

147 items • page 1/15 • next