Items with the keyword procedural_irregularity
- Healy v Slough Borough Council UKEAT/0125/19/JOJAppeal against the ET’s decision rejecting the Claimant’s claims of direct race discrimination, victimisation, protected disclosure detriment, unlawful deduction from wages and unfair constructive dismissal. Appeal allowed.(01/04/2020) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Science Museum Group v Wess UKEAT/0260/18/DAAppeal against the ET’s decision upholding the Claimant’s claim of victimisation. Appeal allowed.(11/06/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- City of London Corporation v McDonnell UKEAT/0196/17/JOJAppeal against the ET’s judgment upholding the Claimant’s claims of ordinary and automatic unfair dismissal. Appeal upheld in part.(06/03/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Balakumar v Imperial College of Health Care NHS Trust UKEAT/0252/16/RNAppeal against the ET’s finding that a remark made by the EJ to the Claimant’s counsel did not give rise to a conclusion of apparent bias. Appeal dismissed.(22/01/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Choksi v Royal Mail Group Ltd UKEAT/0105/17/LAAppeal against a decision by an ET to which the case had been remitted following an appeal to the EAT. Appeal allowed and remitted to a fresh Tribunal.(24/04/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Islam v HSBC Bank Plc UKEAT/0264/16/DMAppeal against a rejection of the Claimant’s application for a reconsideration of its earlier judgment when it had dismissed his claims upon withdrawal. Appeal dismissed.(25/08/2017) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Hassan v Barts Health NHS Trust & Ors UKEAT/0042/16/RNAppeal against directions and orders made at a preliminary hearing. Appeal allowed.(21/08/2017) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Shui v University of Manchester & Ors UKEAT/0230/16/DAAppeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claims of disability discrimination, victimisation and unfair dismissal. Appeal dismissed.(26/07/2017) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- NHS Trust Development Authority (NHS TDA) v Saiger & Ors UKEAT/0167/15/LA; North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust v Saiger & Ors UKEAT/0276/15/LA Appeals against ET decisions where the Respondent complained that the ET had reached conclusions which were not supported by the evidence or were arrived at by inferential conclusions, which could not be drawn from the evidence, or were findings no reasonable Tribunal properly directing itself on the evidence could have reached. Cross appeal against a ruling that the Claimant had a 50% chance of proceeding to the next stage of the appointment process but no chance of either being short listed or appointed. Appeals allowed; cross-appeal dismissed.(18/07/2017) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Isteed v London Borough of Redbridge UKEAT/0442/14/DAAppeal against a wasted costs order made against the solicitor's firm representing the Claimant. Appeal allowed.(14/09/2016) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
33 items • page 1/4 • next
