Items with the keyword part-time_workers
- Augustine v Econnect Cars Ltd UKEAT/0231/18/OOAppeal against the ET’s findings that the Claimant was a “worker” but not an “employee”, that the Claimant was not a “part-time worker” and that the Claimant’s treatment at the end of the relationship was not for any prohibited reason. Appeal allowed in part.(03/01/2020) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Engel v Ministry of Justice and another UKEAT/0279/18/LA & UKEAT/0280/18/LAAppeals against the ET’s decisions concerning the assessment of pension provisions for former chairs of the Residential Property Tribunal Service (“RPTS”). Appeals dismissed.(20/06/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- British Airways Plc v Pinaud [2018] EWCA Civ 2427Appeal against a ruling that the Respondent had treated a part-time worker less favourably than the full-time comparator. Appeal dismissed.(02/11/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Roddis v Sheffield Hallam University UKEAT/0299/17/DMAppeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claim of less favourable treatment under the Part time Workers Regulations. Appeal allowed.(30/05/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Dowokpor v Ministry of Justice UKEAT/0156/17/LAAppeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's application to extend time so that his claim of less favourable treatment as a part-time worker could be heard. Appeal allowed and remitted to a fresh Tribunal.(28/03/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Ministry of Justice v Blackford UKEAT/0003/17/LAAppeal against a decision that the Claimant had been treated less favourably than his full-time comparator. Appeal dismissed.(12/03/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Brazel v The Harpur Trust UKEAT/0102/17/LAAppeal against the ET decision that the Claimant, who worked on a zero-hours contract, had suffered unlawful deductions from her wages because of the way in which the Respondent had calculated her holiday pay. Appeal allowed.(09/03/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- British Airways v Pinaud UKEAT/0291/16/DAAppeal against a finding that the Claimant had been treated less favourably than a full-time worker, contrary to the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000. Appeal dismissed but the question of justification was remitted to a fresh Tribunal.(14/09/2017) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Bowden v Ministry of Justice & Anor UKEAT/0018/17/LAAppeal by part-time judge, who was alleging that he ought to have received a judicial pension and certain other improvements to his terms and conditions, against the dismissal of his claims because the ET refused to extend time. Appeal allowed and remitted to a different Tribunal.(25/08/2017) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- O'Brien v Ministry of Justice [2017] UKSC 46Appeal against a decision by the Court of Appeal, upholding a judgment by the EAT which said that the Claimant, who had won the right under the Council Directive 97/81/EC and national law to a pension on terms equivalent to a comparable full-time judge, could only count the period from the year 2000 when calculating the amount of his pension, and not from the date he started in 1978. The Supreme Court unanimously decided to refer a question to the CJEU.(12/07/2017) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
30 items • page 1/3 • next
