Items with the keyword new_evidence
- Kaler v Insights ESC Ltd UKEAT/0051/20/BAAppeal against the ET’s finding that the Claimant did not meet the definition of disability. Appeal allowed.(23/12/2020) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- MacLeod v The University Court of The University of Glasgow UKEATS/0022/19/ATAppeal against the ET’s decision striking out the Appellant’s case. Appeal dismissed.(10/12/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Hossaini v EDS Recruitment Ltd (t/a J&C Recruitment) and another UKEAT/0297/18/BA & UKEAT/0013/19/BAAppeals against the ET’s decisions (1) dismissing the Claimant’s claims of race and religion and belief discrimination and harassment and ordering him to pay a contribution towards the Respondents’ costs, and (2) refusing the Claimant’s application for reconsideration. Appeals allowed.(10/07/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Philcox v CGDM Ltd T/A Andrew Wilson & Co UKEAT/0189/16/DAAppeal against the dismissal of the Claimant’s claims of sex discrimination, unfair dismissal and unauthorised deductions, the striking out of her post-termination victimisation claims and the making of deposit orders for other claims. All the grounds of appeal were dismissed.(21/03/2017) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- SQR Security Solutions Ltd v Badu UKEAT/0329/15/DAAppeal against the remedy judgment after the claimant's successful claims of race discrimination and unfair dismissal. Appeal allowed and remitted to the ET.(26/05/2016) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Outasight VB Ltd v Brown UKEAT/0253/14/LAAppeal against the granting of a reconsideration of the judgment, which dismissed the claimant’s claim of wrongful dismissal/breach of contract, on the basis that the claimant wished to adduce fresh evidence. Appeal allowed.(19/01/2015) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- North Bristol NHS Trust v Harrold UKEAT/0548/11/CEAAppeal by the respondent against a decision refusing its application for an adjournment in a case where the claimant had alleged victimisation. Appeal also against the refusal of applications to review its decision, and the respondent sought to adduce fresh evidence pursuant to the principles in Ladd v Marshall. Appeal dismissed.(20/09/2012) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Baiyelo v London Borough of Southwark & Ors UKEATPA/1189/10/DMAppeal against a decision by the Tribunal not to vary its original ruling, that the claimant had not been unfairly dismissed, because the claimant’s so-called new evidence could have been adduced at the hearing. Appeal dismissed.(27/06/2011) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Graham's Garden Machinery Ltd v Warne UKEAT/0155/10/DMAppeal against the Tribunal’s decision not to revoke or review a ruling refusing to extend time to file the respondent’s ET3. Appeal succeeded and the matter remitted back to the Tribunal to decide on the question of whether to extend time. The claimant’s application for costs, on the basis that the appeal would not have been necessary had the respondent produced the correct evidence before the Tribunal, was refused.(01/06/2010) • case • CPD: 0/30 mins
9 items
