Items with the keyword blacklisting
- GTR Ltd v Rodway and others UKEAT/0283/19/AT & UKEAT/0284/19/ATAppeal against the ET’s decision permitting an amendment to claims arising out of a dispute over backdated holiday pay and deciding that the claims were brought in time. Appeal allowed.(22/06/2020) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Various Claimants v McAlpine & Ors [2016] EWHC 45 (QB)Claimants’ application to the High Court to admit expert evidence as to the estimation of their potential career earnings, had they not been blacklisted. Application dismissed. (18/01/2016) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Smith v Carillion (JM) Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 209Appeal against an EAT decision, which upheld the ET ruling that there was no contract at all in existence between the claimant and the respondent company as end user. Appeal dismissed.(01/05/2015) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Smith v Carillion (JM) Ltd & Anor UKEAT/0081/13/MCAppeal against a decision that the claimant, who worked for the respondents (the end-users) through an employment agency could not pursue claims against them because he was not employed by them as a worker or otherwise. Appeal dismissed.(20/01/2014) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Miller & Ors v Interserve Industrial Services Ltd UKEAT/0244/12/SMAppeal against a Tribunal decision dismissing the claimant’s claims that they had been blacklisted as a result of their union activity. Appeal dismissed.(09/12/2012) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Balfour Beatty Engineering Services v Allen UKEAT/0236/11/RNAppeal against the decision to extend time for a claim involving blacklisting. Appeal allowed and remitted to a fresh Tribunal for a complete re-hearing.(17/12/2011) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Nolan v Balfour Beatty Engineering Services UKEAT/0109/11/SMAppeal against a finding that, whilst it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant’s claims to be presented within the relevant time limits, they were not presented within a reasonable period thereafter. Appeal dismissed.(23/10/2011) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
7 items
