Items with the keyword Working_Time_Regulations
- Econ Engineering Ltd v Dixon and others UKEAT/0285/19/ATAppeal against the ET’s conclusion that a profitability bonus to which the Claimants were contractually entitled should be included in “the amount of a week’s pay”. Appeal allowed.(02/07/2020) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Pazur v Lexington Catering Services Ltd UKEAT/0008/19/LAAppeal against the ET’s judgment dismissing the Claimant’s claims of detriment and automatic unfair dismissal in respect of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (“WTR”). Appeal allowed.(24/09/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- The Harpur Trust v Brazel [2019] EWCA Civ 1402Appeal against an EAT decision that calculated a part year worker's holiday entitlement as 5.6 weeks was dismissed.(06/08/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Grange v Abellio London Ltd UKEAT/0304/17/JOJAppeal against the ET’s decision that the Claimant’s claim for breach of his entitlement to rest breaks (except in relation to a period of about two months) contrary to reg 12(1) Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR) had been presented out of time; and cross-appeal by the Respondent against the ET’s award of compensation in respect of the period of claim for which it did have jurisdiction. Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed.(12/03/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Saha v Capita Plc UKEAT/0080/18/DMAppeal against a ruling that the Claimant had not been subjected to detriments on the ground that she had made protected disclosures. Appeal allowed and remitted to the same ET.(17/12/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Addison Lee Ltd v Lange & Ors UKEAT/0037/18/BAAppeal against a ruling that the Claimant's were limb (b) workers and that, as such, they were entitled to holiday pay and to the national minimum wage; also against a ruling that time when the drivers were logged on to the Respondent's system, other than break times, was working time. Both appeals dismissed.(15/11/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Leyland & Ors v Hermes ET/1800575/2017An EJ has ruled that couriers for Hermes are limb (b) workers within the meaning of s230(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996, regulation 2(1) Working Time Regulations 1998 and s 54(3)(b) National Minimum Wage Act 1998.(20/07/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake [2018] EWCA Civ 1641Appeal against an EAT ruling that the entirety of the period spent on the premises under sleeper-in arrangements must be taken into account in calculating an employer's obligations under the National Minimum Wage Regulations. Appeal allowed.(16/07/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Flowers & Ors v East of England Ambulance Trust UKEAT/0235/17/JOJAppeal against an ET conclusion that the Claimants’ contractual terms and conditions entitled them to have their non-guaranteed overtime taken into account in the calculation of their holiday pay, but not their voluntary overtime. Appeal allowed.(12/07/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Pimlico Plumbers Ltd & Anor v Smith [2018] UKSC 29Appeal against a decision that the Claimant was a limb (b) worker within the meaning of s230(3) of the ERA 1996 and therefore could pursue his claims of unlawful deductions, holiday pay and disability discrimination. Appeal dismissed.(13/06/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
54 items • page 1/6 • next
