Employment Cases Update
home
cases
news
legislation
resources
CPD
jobs
services
keywords
email
password
log on
sign up
Items with the keyword
Working_Time_Regulations
Uber BV and others v Aslam and others [2021] UKSC 5
Appeal against an ET decision (upheld by the EAT and Court of Appeal) that Uber drivers were workers for the purposes of employment legislation and therefore entitled to be paid the minimum wage, to receive holiday pay and to benefit from other protections. Appeal dismissed.
(19/02/2021) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Hall v London Lions Basketball Club (UK) Ltd UKEAT/0273/19/OO
Appeal against the ET’s quantification of the Claimant’s damages for wrongful dismissal and entitlement to holiday pay. Appeal allowed.
(01/09/2020) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Econ Engineering Ltd v Dixon and others UKEAT/0285/19/AT
Appeal against the ET’s conclusion that a profitability bonus to which the Claimants were contractually entitled should be included in “the amount of a week’s pay”. Appeal allowed.
(02/07/2020) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Pazur v Lexington Catering Services Ltd UKEAT/0008/19/LA
Appeal against the ET’s judgment dismissing the Claimant’s claims of detriment and automatic unfair dismissal in respect of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (“WTR”). Appeal allowed.
(24/09/2019) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
The Harpur Trust v Brazel [2019] EWCA Civ 1402
Appeal against an EAT decision that calculated a part year worker's holiday entitlement as 5.6 weeks was dismissed.
(06/08/2019) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Grange v Abellio London Ltd UKEAT/0304/17/JOJ
Appeal against the ET’s decision that the Claimant’s claim for breach of his entitlement to rest breaks (except in relation to a period of about two months) contrary to reg 12(1) Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR) had been presented out of time; and cross-appeal by the Respondent against the ET’s award of compensation in respect of the period of claim for which it did have jurisdiction. Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed.
(12/03/2019) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Saha v Capita Plc UKEAT/0080/18/DM
Appeal against a ruling that the Claimant had not been subjected to detriments on the ground that she had made protected disclosures. Appeal allowed and remitted to the same ET.
(17/12/2018) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Addison Lee Ltd v Lange & Ors UKEAT/0037/18/BA
Appeal against a ruling that the Claimant's were limb (b) workers and that, as such, they were entitled to holiday pay and to the national minimum wage; also against a ruling that time when the drivers were logged on to the Respondent's system, other than break times, was working time. Both appeals dismissed.
(15/11/2018) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Leyland & Ors v Hermes ET/1800575/2017
An EJ has ruled that couriers for Hermes are limb (b) workers within the meaning of s230(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996, regulation 2(1) Working Time Regulations 1998 and s 54(3)(b) National Minimum Wage Act 1998.
(20/07/2018) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake [2018] EWCA Civ 1641
Appeal against an EAT ruling that the entirety of the period spent on the premises under sleeper-in arrangements must be taken into account in calculating an employer's obligations under the National Minimum Wage Regulations. Appeal allowed.
(16/07/2018) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
56 items page 1/6
next
Find out more
Who can use this site?
What we publish
Why use our online training?
Pricing
Using the site
Search
Keep up to date
Complete an online course
Subscribe
View your training record
Legal Notices
About us
Support
T&Cs
Privacy
Follow us
Email
RSS
Twitter
LinkedIn
powered by
Zehuti
sign up for the employment cases update free weekly email newsletter