Items with the keyword TULRCA
- Markham v Asda Stores Ltd UKEAT/0287/18/OOAppeal against the ET’s decision dismissing the Claimant’s claims categorised as trade union detriment, trade union dismissal, health and safety dismissal, and ordinary unfair dismissal. Appeal allowed in part.(08/10/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley and others [2019] EWCA Civ 1009Appeal against the EAT’s judgment affirming the Claimants’ claims that offers made to them by the Respondent breached their rights under s 145B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (“1992 Act”). Appeal allowed.(21/06/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Professional Trades Union for Prison, Correctional and Secure Psychiatric Workers (“the POA”) v Rolfe UKEAT/0166/18/BAAppeal from a Certification Officer’s decision under s 108A(1) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 granting the Respondent a declaration that the Appellant Union had breached its Rules. Appeal allowed.(30/01/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Seahorse Maritime Ltd v Nautilus International [2018] EWCA Civ 2789Appeal against an ET ruling, upheld by the EAT, that the ET had the jurisdiction to entertain the employees' claim for a protective award. Appeal allowed.(23/01/2019) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Morris v Metrolink RATP DEV Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1358Appeal against an EAT decision that overturned the ET ruling that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed. Appeal allowed and ET decision restored.(15/06/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Keeping Kids Company (In compulsory liquidation) v Smith & Ors UKEAT/0057/17/BAAppeal against a finding that the employer had failed to comply with its obligations under section 188 TULRCA after it was placed in compulsory liquidation, and that the employees were therefore entitled to a 90-day protective award. Appeal allowed in part.(23/02/2018) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley & Ors UKEAT/0108/17/RNAppeal against a decision that the Respondent had breached section 145B of TULR(C)A after it had contacted employees individually in an effort to reach agreement about their terms and conditions. Appeal dismissed.(21/12/2017) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- University of Bolton v Corrigan UKEAT/0408/14/RNAppeal against a finding that the claimant was subjected to a detriment (the withdrawal of a team leader post) of penalising her for taking part in trade union activities and that her dismissal was automatically unfair within the meaning of TULR(C)A section 152 because she had taken part in trade union activities. The first ground of appeal was dismissed, the second ground allowed.(22/12/2015) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- London Borough of Wandsworth v Vining & Ors UKEAT/0234/13/LAApplication by the claimants to amend their answer to the respondent's appeal to raise new points not raised below. Application granted.(30/12/2014) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
- Bone v North Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 652Appeal concerning whether the claimant's trade union was independent for the purposes of suffering detriment under TULRCA and impact on the jurisdiction of the ET in such claims. Appeal allowed and remitted to the EAT so that it can deal with the employer's substantive grounds of appeal against the decision of the employment tribunal.(17/05/2014) • case • CPD: 0/0 mins
18 items • page 1/2 • next
