Employment Cases Update
home
cases
news
legislation
resources
CPD
jobs
services
keywords
email
password
log on
sign up
Items with the keyword
TULRCA
Markham v Asda Stores Ltd UKEAT/0287/18/OO
Appeal against the ET’s decision dismissing the Claimant’s claims categorised as trade union detriment, trade union dismissal, health and safety dismissal, and ordinary unfair dismissal. Appeal allowed in part.
(08/10/2019) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley and others [2019] EWCA Civ 1009
Appeal against the EAT’s judgment affirming the Claimants’ claims that offers made to them by the Respondent breached their rights under s 145B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (“1992 Act”). Appeal allowed.
(21/06/2019) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Professional Trades Union for Prison, Correctional and Secure Psychiatric Workers (“the POA”) v Rolfe UKEAT/0166/18/BA
Appeal from a Certification Officer’s decision under s 108A(1) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 granting the Respondent a declaration that the Appellant Union had breached its Rules. Appeal allowed.
(30/01/2019) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Seahorse Maritime Ltd v Nautilus International [2018] EWCA Civ 2789
Appeal against an ET ruling, upheld by the EAT, that the ET had the jurisdiction to entertain the employees' claim for a protective award. Appeal allowed.
(23/01/2019) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Morris v Metrolink RATP DEV Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1358
Appeal against an EAT decision that overturned the ET ruling that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed. Appeal allowed and ET decision restored.
(15/06/2018) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Keeping Kids Company (In compulsory liquidation) v Smith & Ors UKEAT/0057/17/BA
Appeal against a finding that the employer had failed to comply with its obligations under section 188 TULRCA after it was placed in compulsory liquidation, and that the employees were therefore entitled to a 90-day protective award. Appeal allowed in part.
(23/02/2018) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley & Ors UKEAT/0108/17/RN
Appeal against a decision that the Respondent had breached section 145B of TULR(C)A after it had contacted employees individually in an effort to reach agreement about their terms and conditions. Appeal dismissed.
(21/12/2017) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
University of Bolton v Corrigan UKEAT/0408/14/RN
Appeal against a finding that the claimant was subjected to a detriment (the withdrawal of a team leader post) of penalising her for taking part in trade union activities and that her dismissal was automatically unfair within the meaning of TULR(C)A section 152 because she had taken part in trade union activities. The first ground of appeal was dismissed, the second ground allowed.
(22/12/2015) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
London Borough of Wandsworth v Vining & Ors UKEAT/0234/13/LA
Application by the claimants to amend their answer to the respondent's appeal to raise new points not raised below. Application granted.
(30/12/2014) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
Bone v North Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 652
Appeal concerning whether the claimant's trade union was independent for the purposes of suffering detriment under TULRCA and impact on the jurisdiction of the ET in such claims. Appeal allowed and remitted to the EAT so that it can deal with the employer's substantive grounds of appeal against the decision of the employment tribunal.
(17/05/2014) case
CPD: 0/0 mins
18 items page 1/2
next
Find out more
Who can use this site?
What we publish
Why use our online training?
Pricing
Using the site
Search
Keep up to date
Complete an online course
Subscribe
View your training record
Legal Notices
About us
Support
T&Cs
Privacy
Follow us
Email
RSS
Twitter
LinkedIn
powered by
Zehuti
sign up for the employment cases update free weekly email newsletter