The Claimant was dismissed after his non-attendance on 4 occasions. He made a number of claims at the ET including disability discrimination. The ET found that the Claimant was not a disabled person and that in any event the Respondent did not know and could not have reasonably have known of his disability. The Claimant appealed.

The EAT dismissed the appeal on 2 bases: 1) the Claimant had failed to lead evidence of what particular day to day activities would be affected by his condition and 2) had the Claimant proved that he was disabled, the Tribunal's conclusion on constructive knowledge was one that it was entitled to reach.

[Read the full text of the judgment on Bailii

](http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2018/0002_17_1707.html)