Appeal against findings that the claimant had been subject to unlawful discrimination by way of direct discrimination, harassment and victimisation on the grounds of race and sexual orientation. Appeal dismissed in the main.
(16/05/2013) case CPD: 0/0 mins
Appeal against EAT’s decision to allow an appeal against dismissal of claims, following a Pre Hearing Review, involving allegations of discrimination and whether they were part of a continuing act. Appeal dismissed.
(25/04/2013) case CPD: 0/0 mins
Appeal against the striking out of the claimant’s claims of race, age and sex discrimination and unfair dismissal. Appeal allowed.
(25/04/2013) case CPD: 0/0 mins
Appeal against a decision by the ET to extend time so that the claimant could bring claims of discrimination outside the 3 month limitation period. Appeal allowed and remitted to the same Tribunal to reconsider their findings.
(17/04/2013) case CPD: 0/0 mins
In this month’s round-up, Mark Shulman consultant solicitor with Keystone Law looks at recent cases on post-termination discrimination and some practice points on time limits for presenting claims.
(05/04/2013) resource CPD: 0/0 mins
Appeal against the rejection of the claimant’s claims of direct and indirect discrimination and against a decision not to award her costs.
(06/03/2013) case CPD: 0/0 mins
Appeal against a ruling that the claimant had not suffered harassment on the grounds of religious belief when a colleague shouted out an expletive concerning the Pope. Appeal dismissed.
(15/02/2013) case CPD: 0/0 mins
In this month’s round-up, Mark Shulman consultant solicitor with Keystone Law looks at a recent European Court of Human Rights decision in four conjoined cases on religious discrimination.
(11/02/2013) resource CPD: 0/0 mins
Appeal against the dismissal of the claimant’s claim of discrimination on the grounds of religion. Appeal dismissed.
(10/01/2013) case CPD: 0/0 mins
Appeal by claimant against reversal of ET decision that she had been dismissed for making an implied complaint of discrimination but where the respondent instead believed the claimant herself had made a racist remark. Appeal dismissed.
(10/01/2013) case CPD: 0/0 mins
43 items page 1/5 next >