Application by respondent employers to set aside imposition of a cost protection order as part of their permission to appeal. Application refused.
(28/03/2013) case CPD: 0/0 mins
Appeal against dismissal of claim concerning misuse of confidential information by an employee where the High Court judge had admitted making an incorrect finding but had refused permission to appeal. Appeal allowed and sent for re-trial by a different judge.
(30/12/2012) case CPD: 0/0 mins
Application by respondents that an appeal should only be allowed to proceed if the appellants undertake not to pursue costs against them. Application granted.
(24/08/2012) case CPD: 0/30 mins
Renewed application for permission to appeal against dismissal of claim as being out of time. Application granted.
(16/08/2012) case CPD: 0/0 mins
Renewed application for permission to appeal in a claim for direct discrimination where permission to appeal on indirect discrimination had been granted. Application allowed, partly because the evidence to be heard is similar for both claims.
(10/06/2011) case CPD: 0/0 mins
Appeal against level of compensation in unfair dismissal and victimisation claims, partly on the basis of a request to submit new evidence. Appeal on that ground only allowed and remitted to the same Tribunal for consideration.
(15/04/2011) case CPD: 0/0 mins
Appeal against Registrar's decision not to allow Notice of Appeal filed two days late. Appeal dismissed.
(28/01/2011) case CPD: 0/0 mins
Renewed ex-parte application for permission to appeal on the basis that the claimant was refused adjournments leading to dismissal of sex and race discrimination claims. Application refused.
(03/12/2010) case CPD: 0/0 mins
Application to appeal a decision by the EAT, dismissing claims that the ET had been biased and had limited the basis of the claimant's race discrimination claim before the Tribunal such that important parts of the claim were not dealt with. Application refused.
(05/11/2010) case CPD: 0/0 mins
Application for permission to appeal an order which refused an extension of time to appeal a judgment of the Employment Tribunal. The applicants in this case, who were the respondents to a claim of unfair dismissal, filed their ET3 out of time, and also their Notice of Appeal to the EAT, saying that illness had prevented them from complying with the time limit. The Court of Appeal agreed with the EAT, saying that the Notice of Appeal was out of time because the applicants, by their own admitted mistake, never intended to serve it in time and made no attempt to do so. Application refused.
(05/11/2010) case CPD: 0/0 mins
28 items page 1/3 next >